Internet Billing Method

ABSTRACT

An Internet billing method comprises establishing an agreement between an Internet access provider and a customer, and an agreement between the Internet access provider and a vendor, wherein the Internet access provider agrees with the customer and the vendor to bill the customer and remit to the vendor for products and services purchased over the Internet by the customer from the vendor. The provider creates access to the Internet for the customer. When the customer orders a product or service over the Internet from a vendor, transactional information transmitted between the customer and the vendor is also transmitted to the provider. The provider then bills the transaction amount to the customer and remits a portion of the transaction amount to the vendor, keeping the differential as a fee for providing the service. As a result of this method, there is no need for any customer account numbers or vendor account numbers to be transmitted over the Internet, thereby maintaining the security of that information.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method of billing for commercialtransactions over the Internet.

The Internet is a vast worldwide interconnection of computers andcomputer networks. The Internet does not consist of any specifichardware or group of connected computers, rather it consists of thoseelements that happen to be interconnected at any particular time. TheInternet has certain protocols or rules regarding signal transmissionand anyone with the proper hardware and software can be part of thisinterconnection.

At present, the technical and financial requirements for connectingdirectly to the Internet are beyond the resources of most individualsand thus new businesses known as Internet access providers haveproliferated. These providers invest in the equipment needed to provideaccess to the Internet for subscribers who pay the providers a fee forthe access. Providers include companies whose only business is to offerconnection to the Internet, as well as on-line services such asCompuserve, American On-Line, and Prodigy. In addition, telephonecompanies and cable television companies have announced plans to provideInternet access. A party desiring to connect to the Internet by means ofa provider typically connects via a modem over a telephone network tothe provider's equipment which then connects the party, through theprovider's equipment, to the Internet.

Although the origin of the Internet was for military use, today theprimary users of the Internet are civilian. There is great activity atpresent attempting to utilize the Internet as a channel of commerce.

Many vendors advertise their products and services over the Internet andsolicit orders from Internet users for these wares. While the preferredmode of payment is by credit card, there is great reluctance to transmitcredit card account information over the Internet because of lack ofsecurity. Moreover, in situations wherein the transaction amount issmall—from pennies to a few dollars—it is not economically feasible touse a credit card transaction. There is a need to be able to ensure thatcommercial transactions over the Internet are at least as secure asconventional transactions over the telephone, through the mails, andwith on-line services where credit cards and/or billing accounts areused for purchases. Similarly, there is a need to be able to handle onthe Internet a large number of small-sized transactions, similar to whatis done by telephone companies for conventional telephone service.

The lack of security and the lack of a means to bill for smalltransactions are the biggest obstacles to commercial use of theInternet.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The main object of the present invention is to create a new businessopportunity for telephone companies, cable television companies,existing Internet access providers, and companies offering financialservices by creating a way for them to offer to their subscribers amethod of securely buying and selling goods and services of any valueover the Internet.

Another object of the present invention is an Internet billing methodwhich is cost effective for transactions having transaction amountsranging from pennies to a few dollars.

Still another object of the present invention is to provide a securemethod of billing commercial transactions over the Internet.

A further object of the present invention is an Internet billing methodwhich is simple to use from both the customer's point of view and thatof vendors on the Internet.

Yet another object of the present invention is a billing method whichcan be used by a large number of existing Internet users withoutrequiring major changes in how the users customarily behave and conductcommercial transactions.

These and other objects and advantages of the present invention areachieved by an Internet billing method in accordance with the presentinvention. A provider establishes an agreement with a customer, and asecond agreement with a vendor, wherein the provider agrees with thecustomer and the vendor to bill for products and services purchased overthe Internet by the customer from the vendor. Associated with thecustomer agreement are one or more billing accounts to which purchasesmay be charged. Associated with the vendor agreement are one or moremethods of remitting funds to the vendor. The provider creates access tothe Internet for the customer through the provider's equipment. When thecustomer orders a product or service over the Internet from the vendor,the provider obtains transactional information transmitted between thecustomer and the vendor including a transaction amount relating to theordered product or service and the provider then bills the transactionamount to a customer billing account and remits a portion of thetransaction amount to the vendor.

Which accounts are used may be specified in the agreements made betweenthe provider and the customer and between the provider and the vendor,or may be specified in the transactional information. If specified inthe transactional information, the selection of account can be made byreferencing the type of account (e.g., “VISA”, “phone bill”), or theposition of that account on a predetermined list (e.g., “the 3rdaccount”), and does not require that any actual account numbers betransmitted.

By the use of this method, there is no need for the customer to transmitover the Internet any information containing any of the customer'sbilling account numbers thereby maintaining the security of thatinformation.

The present invention, in a preferred embodiment, is a method ofproviding merchants with the ability to offer their customers securetransactions for the purchase of goods and services of any value overthe Internet, without the need for the customer to transmit any creditcard or other account numbers over the Internet, without the need forthe customer to sign up with any additional provider of services, andwithout the need to change the manner in which most customers currentlyuse the Internet.

In accordance with the present invention, a customer desiring topurchase goods and services over the Internet has prearranged access tothe Internet through the services of an Internet access provider. Suchproviders can be, for example, companies whose only business is to offerconnection to the Internet, companies which offer on-line computerservices, one of which is connection to the Internet, cable televisioncompanies, or telephone companies. In arranging for access with such aprovider, the customer has agreed with the provider on a method ofpayment which is, for example, by billing, or charge to a credit card,or charge to an account of the user which could be an account specificto the Internet or could be a more general account, such as an on-linecomputer services account, a cable television account, a telephoneaccount, or a bank account.

Once the prearrangements have been completed, using the provider'sservice to connect to the Internet typically involves calling atelephone number of the provider and being automatically connectedthrough the provider's equipment to the Internet.

Once connected to the Internet, the customer can browse around until anitem is located that the customer wishes to purchase, at which time thecustomer will follow the instructions created by the vendor, exchangetransactional information, and ultimately agree to purchase something bytaking an appropriate action. In the course of making the purchase, themeans of delivery of the goods or service will be established. Dependingon the type of goods, delivery can be made, for example, by mail (e.g.,in the case of a purchase of a book), by courier service (e.g., in thecase of a purchase of flowers), or by electronic transmission over theInternet (e.g., in the case of delivery of an electronic newsletter orpiece of software). The remaining element of the purchase transaction isthe manner in which the customer pays the vendor.

In accordance with the present invention, the provider has madearrangements with vendors who wish to sell goods and services over theInternet to the customers of the provider. The provider agrees to do thebilling associated with such sales for the vendors, and as part of theagreement, the provider and the vendor have agreed on the manner inwhich the provider will remit funds to the vendor. Examples of paymentinclude payment by check, credit to the vendor's credit card merchantaccount, or credit to another account of the vendor's, such as thevendor's cable television account, telephone account, or bank account.The account of the vendor to be credited need not be with the provider.The arrangements that are made will depend on the vendor's desires andthe capabilities of the provider. For example, if the vendor anticipatesmany small transactions and the provider is a telephone company, theycan agree that the provider will credit the vendor's existing telephoneaccount for amounts under some nominal amount and credit the vendor'scredit card merchant account for larger amounts. If the vendoranticipates large transactions, then they may agree that the providerwill pay by check or direct credit to the vendor's bank account.

In a typical transaction in accordance with the present invention, fromthe customer's point of view all use of the Internet appears to beconventional. Depending upon the prearrangements made between theprovider and the customer and between the provider and the vendor, thecustomer can charge a purchase, for example, to a credit card, to acable television account, to a telephone account or to a bank account.The account of the customer to be billed need not be with the provider.For example, the customer may be using one telephone company as anaccess provider and a second telephone company as a telephone serviceprovider and the account to be billed is that with the second telephonecompany. The customer specifies which account is to be billed by anindication to the provider, but neither the customer nor the vendor hasto transmit any account numbers over the Internet, because it is theprovider, not the vendor, who submits the charge to the credit cardcompany, the cable television company, the telephone company, or toanother account of the customer, or who debits the bank account of thecustomer, and the provider already has been given, during the course ofmaking prearrangements with the customer and the vendor, the appropriateaccount numbers of both the customer and the vendor. The provider sendsthis information to the appropriate party, and may do so by the samesecure means customarily used for similar transactions not made over theInternet.

From the vendor's point of view, the transaction is as secure as atransaction made over the telephone with a credit card. If the vendorwishes, the vendor may verify with the provider that the addresssupplied by the customer for shipment of the goods has been authorizedby the customer in the same manner in which such verification would bemade for the same transaction made over the telephone with a creditcard. In addition, because such a verification does not require thetransmission of any account numbers of the customer, the verificationcan be done over the Internet as part of the transaction transmissionitself if the provider and the vendor have prearranged to do so.

From the provider's point of view, the provider is made aware that thecustomer has authorized the charge by monitoring the data being sentover the Internet through the provider's equipment between the customerand the vendor. This can be done, for example, by specifying a specificcode which, when sent between the customer and the vendor, indicates tothe provider that a transaction has been completed. When the customerhas made a purchase, the provider charges the transaction amount to theagreed account of the customer and remits the agreed portion of thatamount to the vendor, keeping the differential as the provider's chargefor making the service available.

These and other features and advantages of the present invention willbecome apparent from the following detailed description of the inventionwith reference to the attached drawings, wherein:

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system for carrying out the billingmethod according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a flow chart of one embodiment of the method according to thepresent invention; and

FIG. 3 is a flow chart of another embodiment of the method according tothe present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 1, a system for carrying out the method of the presentinvention is shown. In that system, the Internet is shown schematicallyas network 1 to which providers 2, 9, vendors 5.1-5.n, 6.1-6.n and8.1-8.n, and customers 4.1-4.n and 10.1-10.n (where n is an integer toindicate a range from one to many) are connected in different ways.

Provider 2 is connected to access network 3 and the Internet 1 andprovides access to the Internet 1 for customers 4.1-4.n and vendors6.1-6.n connected to access network 3. Access network 3 can be atelephone network, a cable television network, an on-line servicesnetwork such as Compuserve, American On-Line, or Prodigy, or a privateInternet access network. Similarly, provider 9 is connected to accessnetwork 7 and the Internet 1 and provides access to the Internet 1 forcustomers 10.1-10.n and vendors 8.1-8.n. Vendors 5.1-5.n access theInternet directly by their own equipment.

In accordance with the method shown in the flow chart of FIG. 2, forexample, in step 11 provider 2 establishes agreements with vendors5.1-5.n who are connected directly to the Internet, with vendors 6.1-6.nwho access the Internet via access network 3 and provider 2, and withvendors 8.1-8.n who are connected to the Internet 1 via access network 7and provider 9, to bill customers 4.1-4.n for goods and servicespurchased by them over the Internet from vendors 5.1-5.n, 6.1-6.n and8.1-8.n. Provider 2 also agrees to remit a portion of the collectedmoney back to the vendors. Provider 2 also establishes an agreement witheach of customers 4.1-4.n. These agreements provide that the providerwill bill the customer for goods and services purchased by them over theInternet. The billing will be done to billing accounts established inconnection with the agreements. The billing accounts can be, forexample, credit card accounts, telephone accounts, cable televisionaccounts, on-line services accounts, or bank accounts. The accounts neednot be with the provider if the provider has a billing agreement inplace with the party with whom the account was established.

As part of the services of the provider to customers 4.1-4.n, thecustomer is connected to the Internet 1 in step 12 at a desired time,typically by making contact via modem. Once connected to the Internet,the customer can interface with any one of vendors 5.1-5.n, 6.1-6.n and8.1-8.n in order to find out about products or services offered by thosevendors.

When one of customers 4.1-4.n makes the decision to order a product orservice from one of vendors 5.1-5.n, 6.1-6.n and 8.1-8.n, in step 13 anexchange of transactional information occurs between the customer andthe vendor. This exchange may include identifying information relatingto the customer, such as the customer's Internet address, informationrelating to the products or services to be purchased, including thetransaction amount, the manner and time of delivery, and a referencenumber to identify the order. The vendor or the customer also canproduce a verification code signifying that a transaction has beencompleted which can be received by provider 2.

In step 14, the transactional information is obtained by provider 2. Thecommunication can be a separate transmission by the vendor or thecustomer to provider 2, or provider 2 can extract the information fromthe exchange of information taking place between the customer and thevendor through equipment of provider 2. Provider 2 can then sendverifying information to one or both of the customer and vendor toindicate that the transaction has been approved, if approval of a thirdparty, such as credit card company, is required. Most importantly, theentire transaction takes place without the need of communicating thecustomer's credit card or other account number over the Internet 1.

The product or service is delivered to the customer in step 15 and theappropriate customer account is billed by provider 2 in step 16.Provider 2 then remits the agreed payment in the appropriate manner tothe vendor in step 17, keeping the differential as a service charge forthe services rendered by provider 2. Steps 15, 16 and 17 may beperformed in any order.

As can be seen from FIG. 1, the method according to the presentinvention can be carried out in many ways. For example, referring toFIG. 3, vendor 5.1 in step 21 can establish remitting agreements withprovider 2 and provider 9 to remit to vendor 5.1 a portion of atransaction amount billed to the billing account of any one of customers4.1-4.n and 10.1-10.n.

Similarly, each of vendors 6.1-6.n can establish a remitting agreementwith provider 9 for transactions carried out over the Internet betweeneach of vendors 6.1-6.n and customers 10.1-10.n.

A customer connects to the Internet in step 22. The customer exchangestransactional information with the vendor in step 23 and the vendordelivers a product or service to the customer in step 25, either beforeor after the vendor receives remittances from the provider in step 27.

In accordance with another feature of the present invention, prior tothe billing of the transaction amount to the account of the customer,and after obtaining the transactional information, the provider canobtain approval from a third party to bill the transaction amount to thebilling account. This is particularly true in the case where the billingaccount is a credit card account or a bank account. In that instance,approval must be obtained from a third party, i.e., the bank issuing thecredit card or with whom the bank account was established. Where theaccount is with the provider, approval would be obtained from theprovider itself. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, theapproval can be obtained over the Internet and most preferably duringthe communication between the customer and the vendor.

In accordance with a further feature of the present invention, thecustomer can specify a particular billing account, for example, a creditcard account, a bank account, a telephone number account, a cabletelevision account or an on-line services account at the time that thebilling agreement is established with the provider. The specificationcan provide that one account will be used for certain transactions, anda different account for other transactions, for example, a telephoneaccount for transactions less than $5.00, and a bank account fortransactions of at least $5.00. Thereafter, whenever the transactionamount is to be billed, it will be billed to that specified billingaccount. Alternatively, the customer can specify a plurality of billingaccounts, for example, an AMEX account, a VISA account, a Mastercardaccount at the time that the billing agreement is established. When thetransactional information is communicated, it will include anidentification of which of those plurality of billing accounts thecustomer wants billed, without, however, specifying the account numberof the account. Thus the customer can merely indicate the account by the“brand” name AMEX, VISA or Mastercard or the customer can identify it asthe first account, second account or third account on a list previouslyestablished with the provider.

As noted above, the billing account is not necessarily with theprovider, that is, it can be with a third party such as a bank issuing acredit card, or a bank at which the customer has a bank account.Alternatively, the provider can be a first telephone company, but thebilling account can be with a second telephone company and charged bythe first telephone company to the telephone number account of thecustomer with the second telephone company, as is customarily done inconnection with conventional telecommunications services.

In accordance with the invention, the remitting can be by means ofsending money or by crediting a vendor account such as a credit cardmerchant account, a bank account, a telephone number account, a cabletelevision account or an on-line services account.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the step ofestablishing the remitting account comprises specifying a particularvendor account to which the portion of the transaction amount will beremitted. The specification can provide that one account will be usedfor certain transactions, and a different account for othertransactions, for example, a telephone account for transactions lessthan $5.00, and a bank account for transactions of at least $5.00. In analternative embodiment of the present invention, the step ofestablishing the remitting agreement comprises the vendor specifying aplurality of vendor accounts to which a portion of the transactionaccount can be remitted. Thus when the transactional information iscommunicated, the vendor can identify which one of the plurality ofvendor accounts the amount is to be remitted to without, however,specifying the specific account number.

The vendor account can be an account with the provider or an accountwith a third party such as a credit card merchant account, or bankaccount, with a bank, or a cable television account with a cabletelevision company.

It is understood that the embodiments described hereinabove are merelyillustrative and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.It is realized that various changes, alterations, rearrangements andmodifications can be made by those skilled in the art withoutsubstantially departing from the spirit and scope of the presentinvention.

1-30. (canceled)
 31. A method for billing for a purchase transactionover the Internet between a purchasing customer and a selling vendor bya telephone service provider which is not the selling vendor, the methodcomprising the telephone service provider: providing access to theInternet for the purchasing customer and charging the purchasingcustomer a transaction amount for the purchase transaction by chargingthe transaction amount to an account of the purchasing customer.
 32. Themethod according to claim 31, wherein the account of the purchasingcustomer is an account with the telephone service provider.
 33. Themethod according to claim 31, wherein the account of the purchasingcustomer is a credit card account or a bank account.
 34. The methodaccording to any one of claims 31-33, wherein the selling vendor doesnot receive the account number to which the transaction amount ischarged before the transaction amount is charged to the account.
 35. Themethod according to any one of claims 31-33, wherein delivery of theproduct or service purchased in the purchase transaction is byelectronic transmission.
 36. The method according to claim 34, whereindelivery of the product or service purchased in the purchase transactionis by electronic transmission.
 37. The method according to any one ofclaims 31-33, wherein delivery of the product or service purchased inthe purchase transaction is by mail or courier.
 38. The method accordingto claim 34, wherein delivery of the product or service purchased in thepurchase transaction is by mail or courier.
 39. The method according toany one of claims 31-33, wherein the telephone service provider isadvised that the customer desires to enter into the purchase transactionbefore the vendor is advised that the customer desires to enter into thepurchase transaction.
 40. The method according to claim 34, wherein thetelephone service provider is advised that the customer desires to enterinto the purchase transaction before the vendor is advised that thecustomer desires to enter into the purchase transaction.
 41. The methodaccording to claim 35, wherein the telephone service provider is advisedthat the customer desires to enter into the purchase transaction beforethe vendor is advised that the customer desires to enter into thepurchase transaction.
 42. The method according to claim 36, wherein thetelephone service provider is advised that the customer desires to enterinto the purchase transaction before the vendor is advised that thecustomer desires to enter into the purchase transaction.
 43. The methodaccording to claim 37, wherein the telephone service provider is advisedthat the customer desires to enter into the purchase transaction beforethe vendor is advised that the customer desires to enter into thepurchase transaction.
 44. The method according to claim 38, wherein thetelephone service provider is advised that the customer desires to enterinto the purchase transaction before the vendor is advised that thecustomer desires to enter into the purchase transaction.
 45. The methodaccording to any one of claims 31-33, wherein the telephone serviceprovider is not advised that the customer desires to enter into thepurchase transaction before the vendor is advised that the customerdesires to enter into the purchase transaction.
 46. The method accordingto claim 34, wherein the telephone service provider is not advised thatthe customer desires to enter into the purchase transaction before thevendor is advised that the customer desires to enter into the purchasetransaction.
 47. The method according to claim 35, wherein the telephoneservice provider is not advised that the customer desires to enter intothe purchase transaction before the vendor is advised that the customerdesires to enter into the purchase transaction.
 48. The method accordingto claim 36, wherein the telephone service provider is not advised thatthe customer desires to enter into the purchase transaction before thevendor is advised that the customer desires to enter into the purchasetransaction.
 49. The method according to claim 37, wherein the telephoneservice provider is not advised that the customer desires to enter intothe purchase transaction before the vendor is advised that the customerdesires to enter into the purchase transaction.
 50. The method accordingto claim 38, wherein the telephone service provider is not advised thatthe customer desires to enter into the purchase transaction before thevendor is advised that the customer desires to enter into the purchasetransaction.
 51. The method according to any one of claims 31-33,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 52. The method according to claim 34,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 53. The method according to claim 35,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 54. The method according to claim 36,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 55. The method according to claim 37,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 56. The method according to claim 38,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 57. The method according to claim 39,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 58. The method according to claim 40,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 59. The method according to claim 41,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 60. The method according to claim 42,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 61. The method according to claim 43,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 62. The method according to claim 44,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 63. The method according to claim 45,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 64. The method according to claim 46,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 65. The method according to claim 47,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 66. The method according to claim 48,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 67. The method according to claim 49,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 68. The method according to claim 69,wherein the telephone service provider receives authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer without previously having received authorizationfrom the selling vendor to charge the transaction amount to the accountof the purchasing customer.
 69. The method according to any one ofclaims 31-33, wherein the telephone service provider receivesauthorization from the selling vendor to charge the transaction amountto the account of the purchasing customer without previously havingreceived authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 70. Themethod according to claim 34, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 71. Themethod according to claim 35, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 72. Themethod according to claim 36, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 73. Themethod according to claim 37, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 74. Themethod according to claim 38, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 75. Themethod according to claim 39, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 76. Themethod according to claim 40, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 77. Themethod according to claim 41, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 78. Themethod according to claim 42, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 79. Themethod according to claim 43, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 80. Themethod according to claim 44, herein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 81. Themethod according to claim 45, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 82. Themethod according to claim 46, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 83. Themethod according to claim 47, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 84. Themethod according to claim 48, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 85. Themethod according to claim 49, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 86. Themethod according to claim 50, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer.
 76. Themethod according to claim 40, wherein the telephone service providerreceives authorization from the selling vendor to charge the transactionamount to the account of the purchasing customer without previouslyhaving received authorization from the purchasing customer to charge thetransaction amount to the account of the purchasing customer. 77-80.(canceled)
 81. The method according to claim 45, wherein the telephoneservice provider receives authorization from the selling vendor tocharge the transaction amount to the account of the purchasing customerwithout previously having received authorization from the purchasingcustomer to charge the transaction amount to the account of thepurchasing customer.
 82. The method according to claim 46, wherein thetelephone service provider receives authorization from the sellingvendor to charge the transaction amount to the account of the purchasingcustomer without previously having received authorization from thepurchasing customer to charge the transaction amount to the account ofthe purchasing customer. 83-86. (canceled)